Conference realignment 3.0

Nowhere to go but up.
User avatar
Crank
Senior
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 9:57 am
Location: Berkshire Expatriate in MetroWest
Contact:

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by Crank » Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:50 pm

The scariest part of all of this is that the AAC could realistically end up losing 3 schools making it a much less desirable landing spot. Current speculation seems to be Houston, Memphis and Cincinnati leaving which leaves quite a hole to fill on both the football and basketball sides of the fence. While I think the AAC is the most likely and realistic landing spot for UMass, the league might not look so hot at that point.

User avatar
UMass02
Senior
Posts: 1255
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 8:14 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by UMass02 » Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:00 pm

It is the AAC or bust at this point, regardless of the conference membership. Independence/A10 isn't doable for the long haul. A Power 5 invite is a pipe dream in the short-to-medium term. Sun Belt and C-USA look like no-gos. They NEED to be in the AAC.

KahunaK
Senior
Posts: 1013
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: No. Virginia

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by KahunaK » Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:36 pm


User avatar
njumass08
Hall of Fame
Posts: 5607
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:06 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by njumass08 » Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:42 pm

Going to be an interesting month of August for us.
Looking forward to the 2022 UMass Football Season (Oh boy, just jinxed that one)

mdogt12
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:30 pm
Location: maine

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by mdogt12 » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:50 pm

http://www.cbssports.com/college-footba ... 16-season/

Big 12 wants to decide before 2016 season begins if possible.

stevemaz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by stevemaz » Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:38 am

I think we will see the current Div 1 in NCAA break into two groups. Umass needs to make sure they are in that top group which what I can see will be the P5's and a few others. I think the P5s will pull along with them both the Mountain West and the AAC (both of which will expand to 14-16 schools). For other sports (especially hoops obviously) the Big East and probably A10 survives along with maybe a few others.

That said, I would be stunned if Umass is not invited to AAC this Fall assuming Big 12 goes through with it). If that happens the goal by 2020ish is to become the top sports program outside of the P5 and I believe this can happen.

User avatar
m626t
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2596
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:24 pm
Location: Western Mass

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by m626t » Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:54 am

Hoping we get an invite, and Ct stays.
All due respect, and I mean that from the bottom of my heart, I'm gonna pass.

User avatar
Berkman
Hall of Fame
Posts: 7240
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Mooresville, NC
Contact:

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by Berkman » Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:09 am

I think that this is a make or break time for the FB program. If we don't get into the AAC now who knows if/when we will get another chance to get into a conference.

stevemaz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by stevemaz » Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:00 am

Is Tulane a wild card in the Big 12 derby? I could see Big 12 sticking with full time members and keeping a realistic footprint. So with that in mind I could see Cincy, Memphis, Tulane, and Houston going to Big 12.

From there here some thoughts on expanded AAC
East: UConn, Temple, Navy, East Carolina, South Fla, Central Fla, Umass, ODU
West: Tulsa, SMU, San Diego State, Boise St, UNLV, Colorado St, Air Force, BYU

User avatar
Berkman
Hall of Fame
Posts: 7240
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Mooresville, NC
Contact:

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by Berkman » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:58 am

Do you think that they would want a western division with all those schools that far west? Sure would make for expensive traveling.

stevemaz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by stevemaz » Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:16 am

I think It would be one trip for football..

stevemaz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by stevemaz » Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:30 am

i think if Big 12 does to 14 for all sports and BYU is invited it would be Cincy, Houston, BYU, and Colorado St.

User avatar
njumass08
Hall of Fame
Posts: 5607
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:06 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by njumass08 » Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:25 pm

^ Memphis > Colorado St

IMHO
Looking forward to the 2022 UMass Football Season (Oh boy, just jinxed that one)

User avatar
Big10Land
Sophomore
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 10:12 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by Big10Land » Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:08 pm

^ Agreed, and what Mountain West teams would want to join a raided AAC? It would be a wash for improvement then add time zone problems and broken rivalries.
Oh my god, they love state schools out here.

stevemaz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: Conference realignment 3.0

Post by stevemaz » Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:20 pm

it may not be called AAC anymore.. just trying to group the best of the rest together. this will never include Hawaii, fresno state, san jose st, Nevada, Utah st and Wyoming..

Post Reply