Marcus Camby Article
-
Mrbaseball220
- Junior
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:19 am
Marcus Camby Article
Here is an article I found on Boston.com, I thought some might be interested in.
http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball ... wth_spurt/
Great article. It is nice to see him understanding the mistake he made and owning up to it. I had no idea he payed the money back and was so active in charities. I really hope to see him back at Umass sooner rather then later.
http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball ... wth_spurt/
Great article. It is nice to see him understanding the mistake he made and owning up to it. I had no idea he payed the money back and was so active in charities. I really hope to see him back at Umass sooner rather then later.
- BostonBert
- Junior
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:47 am
That was a very good article, and for the first time addressed whether or not UMass was willing to have any kind of relationship with him. UMass got screwed for being somewhat upfront with the NCAA when it all started crashing down. If Reggie Bush can have his number retired at USC, there is no reason why Marcus Camby can't have his retired at UMass. The guy put UMass on the map in the modern era of college basketball which is far more than one of the purchased retired numbers that hang on the wall can say.
-
LooneyGoon
- Junior
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:17 am
An awesome experiment would be to assign the same article to Shaughnessy and see how the finished product differs from Spears' piece.Kosty wrote:I find it interesting that the author's last name is Spears.....
Anyway, someone should walk this article over to CHB and let him stew over it a bit.
When I first saw the article I was kind of hoping Shaughnessy wrote it
Here's a great comment from that Globe article:
It was very easy for the NCAA to come down on UMass, who was arguably a flash-in-the-pan with our early 90s success, than USC, who had much more established success in their sport. Also, the revenue that USC football generates for the NCAA is dozens of times over what UMass basketball did. The NCAA had a lot more to lose by cracking down on USC than UMass.
And yet they're still a tax-exempt organization
My (admittedly biased) take on that:Can someone answer me this question.....Why does UMASS get penalized for what Camby did, but USC walks away without any penalties for what Reggie Bush did? Bush's family lived in a house piad for by a booster and USC didn't know about it?? Please.................
It was very easy for the NCAA to come down on UMass, who was arguably a flash-in-the-pan with our early 90s success, than USC, who had much more established success in their sport. Also, the revenue that USC football generates for the NCAA is dozens of times over what UMass basketball did. The NCAA had a lot more to lose by cracking down on USC than UMass.
And yet they're still a tax-exempt organization
-
sleepy sheep
- Junior
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Boston