The best pass plays all season have been the 50/50 jump balls down the sidelines. They have a better chance to move the ball trying that 3 times than whatever offense they are running. It can’t get any worse.minutefanjsf wrote: ↑Sun Oct 16, 2022 11:50 amThe pass plays that were attempted yesterday looked like good designs. No execution. Dzuro almost got Johnson killed by throwing him into coverage. The 50/50 balls UMass caught were all the receivers. Wise didn’t throw anywhere near the receivers. And, Dzuro was high on most of his throws.
Game Seven: Buffalo
-
- Senior
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:00 am
- Location: South Boston
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
- InnervisionsUMASS
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17265
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:32 am
- Location: Milford, MA
- Contact:
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
Camby4Life wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:48 pm
The best pass plays all season have been the 50/50 jump balls down the sidelines. They have a better chance to move the ball trying that 3 times than whatever offense they are running. It can’t get any worse.
That would require an adjustment... and I don't think our OC is capable of doing such a thing.
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades
- UMass'96
- Senior
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: Back in the good 'ole US of A not some 3rd world shithole
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
Even just basic pass plays - a swing pass or a pass to the RB in the flat, or simple screen passes - have been completely absent from the play calling.
I get it that maybe you don't have a QB with the arm strength or accuracy to go downfield. But even just basic, simple passes would help to keep the defense honest.
If I were an opposing team, I would play run all game long and dare/wait for UMass to do something different. Even if they beat the defense on one explosive pass play, that wouldn't be enough for me to stop loading the box. UMass hasn't demonstrated anything that proves that they could do it again...
Either Casula knows something fundamentally that we don't about the ability of the QB's to throw the ball or, the guy is incompetent. It's mind boggling to watch this offense.
I get it that maybe you don't have a QB with the arm strength or accuracy to go downfield. But even just basic, simple passes would help to keep the defense honest.
If I were an opposing team, I would play run all game long and dare/wait for UMass to do something different. Even if they beat the defense on one explosive pass play, that wouldn't be enough for me to stop loading the box. UMass hasn't demonstrated anything that proves that they could do it again...
Either Casula knows something fundamentally that we don't about the ability of the QB's to throw the ball or, the guy is incompetent. It's mind boggling to watch this offense.
Save your breath... you'll need it to blow up your date
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:17 am
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
They have tried some swing passes and screens. All failed. Some the ball have been overthrown, some under thrown, some way too hot to handle. The one that took the cake though was the screen in this game where there were no blockers out in front. The pass was caught, too. would’ve been better to drop it.UMass'96 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:18 pm Even just basic pass plays - a swing pass or a pass to the RB in the flat, or simple screen passes - have been completely absent from the play calling.
I get it that maybe you don't have a QB with the arm strength or accuracy to go downfield. But even just basic, simple passes would help to keep the defense honest.
If I were an opposing team, I would play run all game long and dare/wait for UMass to do something different. Even if they beat the defense on one explosive pass play, that wouldn't be enough for me to stop loading the box. UMass hasn't demonstrated anything that proves that they could do it again...
Either Casula knows something fundamentally that we don't about the ability of the QB's to throw the ball or, the guy is incompetent. It's mind boggling to watch this offense.
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
I remember the old saying, the best offense is a good defense. We give up a lot of points, get a lot of penalties. Lots to work on.
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
our defense is actually not that bad; its the supposed offense that sucks. Only Iowa has a similar points scored but their defense is absolute lights out. Our pass defense is pretty good but we have to be able to throw a forward pass.
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
we're second to last in offense only better than Iowa but Iowa's defense is absolutely awesome. Can't believe one of our 4 QB's is incapable of throwing a ball 5 or 10 yards to somebody (preferably wearing the same color uniform as us).
- InnervisionsUMASS
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17265
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:32 am
- Location: Milford, MA
- Contact:
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
^
We have 1, if not 2, that can do such a thing. We don't have an OC that will allow that to occur.
We have 1, if not 2, that can do such a thing. We don't have an OC that will allow that to occur.
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
then we have to get rid of the OC. statistically we are identical to NMSU in team offense and defense. We will be coming off a bye and they will be banged up from San Jose State and then a long flight for them. I'm sorry, NMSU is our super bowl for getting another win. Really glad we got Stony Brook this year and not Merrimack. We'd be looking at 0-12.InnervisionsUMASS wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:06 pm ^
We have 1, if not 2, that can do such a thing. We don't have an OC that will allow that to occur.
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:17 am
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
I think Dzuro is the guy for the rest of the season. I hope so, too. Put Gino in the slot. Run some wildcat with Wise. And get Olson to a a shrink, he’s been worked over a lot.InnervisionsUMASS wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:06 pm ^
We have 1, if not 2, that can do such a thing. We don't have an OC that will allow that to occur.
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
i suspect with the bye they will be working on a few new things on offense. At least that is what a good head coach would do when he see's it isnt working. I would put the QB under center 50% of the time or more and use a power running attack with play action passes and traditional screens.
- InnervisionsUMASS
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17265
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:32 am
- Location: Milford, MA
- Contact:
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
minutefanjsf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 5:49 pm I think Dzuro is the guy for the rest of the season. I hope so, too. Put Gino in the slot. Run some wildcat with Wise. And get Olson to a a shrink, he’s been worked over a lot.
This would all require creativity, and I'm not sure our OC has that capability. I sure as hell hope I'm wrong.
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4398
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:12 am
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
Surprised that he hasn't adjusted to some of the more traditional concepts that Michigan ran while he was there.. would make much more sense for this roster.
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
Pride goeth before the fall…I’m guessing it’s a pride thing with Casula.TheInsider wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 7:41 am Surprised that he hasn't adjusted to some of the more traditional concepts that Michigan ran while he was there.. would make much more sense for this roster.
- Rolling Ridge
- Junior
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:17 pm
Re: Game Seven: Buffalo
Honest question here... what exactly is Casula's offensive philosophy or approach? What is it he trying to implement or hold onto to be "proud" of? If he isn't adopting more "traditional" concepts, what is doing that's "nontraditional?"LouMass wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 8:47 amPride goeth before the fall…I’m guessing it’s a pride thing with Casula.TheInsider wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 7:41 am Surprised that he hasn't adjusted to some of the more traditional concepts that Michigan ran while he was there.. would make much more sense for this roster.
To me, it doesn't appear to be an issue of approach as much as it is that the playbook is extremely limited and completely vanilla. I would think this has a lot to do with the talent (or lack thereof) he has to work with, to which he's reacted with an exceptionally conservative approach. If he's being stubborn about opening it up a little, that's one thing, but if he's shooting for something specific, I'd like to better understand what it is.