tulane game

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm

Re: tulane game

Post by ZooMass84 » Sun Sep 04, 2022 11:49 am

dennisdent wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 10:08 am I have total faith that Brown can get the program going in the right direction. He knows what it takes to win and be competitive.
He also needs players. Can we beat Stony Brook?

Floyd
Hall of Fame
Posts: 8934
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 am
Location: Not where I should be

Re: tulane game

Post by Floyd » Sun Sep 04, 2022 11:50 am

People gotta stay behind the program. Its a process, it wasn't going to flip over in one offseason. Gonna take a little time. Just improve week to week
Time to Win

minutefanjsf
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:17 am

Re: tulane game

Post by minutefanjsf » Sun Sep 04, 2022 12:59 pm

ZooMass84 wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 11:49 am
dennisdent wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 10:08 am I have total faith that Brown can get the program going in the right direction. He knows what it takes to win and be competitive.
He also needs players. Can we beat Stony Brook?
Yes. Tulane’s record last year was not indicative of their level of play. They are likely an 5-7 win team in the AAC. They could over achieve. First game is out of the way. Now they know what to work on.

TheInsider
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4341
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:12 am

Re: tulane game

Post by TheInsider » Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:50 pm

Tulane's over/under win total was 6.. saw a lot of people go with the over. It's going to take some game action for Brown's defense to start to take hold.. it can be complicated with responsibilities ever changing. It takes time. The one thing I am worried about is QB play.. if we can improve there I think we are decent enough in other areas to have some positive growth this year. Can't overreact to game 1.. remember Rutgers a few years ago.. I came out of that game thinking we might be kinda good...

User avatar
Uminuteman
Senior
Posts: 918
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:45 am

Re: tulane game

Post by Uminuteman » Sun Sep 04, 2022 3:11 pm

TheInsider wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:50 pm The one thing I am worried about is QB play.. if we can improve there I think we are decent enough in other areas to have some positive growth this year.
It can't get worse (can it?). Those were bad Pop Warner stats.

minutefanjsf
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:17 am

Re: tulane game

Post by minutefanjsf » Sun Sep 04, 2022 5:10 pm

TheInsider wrote: Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:50 pm Tulane's over/under win total was 6.. saw a lot of people go with the over. It's going to take some game action for Brown's defense to start to take hold.. it can be complicated with responsibilities ever changing. It takes time. The one thing I am worried about is QB play.. if we can improve there I think we are decent enough in other areas to have some positive growth this year. Can't overreact to game 1.. remember Rutgers a few years ago.. I came out of that game thinking we might be kinda good...
The Rutgers game is my touchstone. Bell had no clue. DB does and will get the most out of the players instead of sticking to a formula.

User avatar
Quann
Hall of Fame
Posts: 2129
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Hopkinton, MA

Re: tulane game

Post by Quann » Sun Sep 04, 2022 8:03 pm

Trust the process.

tdmass
Senior
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:40 am
Location: Ormond Beach,Florida

Re: tulane game

Post by tdmass » Mon Sep 05, 2022 9:26 am

^ I'm old and the "process" doesn't mean what it used to!

I didn't notice this before but I think Coach wasn't too pleased with some of his reputedly higher rated guys that
didn't come to play!

“We have some guys that like to play the game. We have some guys who need to put both feet in the ground and decide they need to be great football players,” Brown said. “If they make that decision, it’ll help our development. If they don’t, we’ll go with the guys that do.”

photoman
Senior
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:25 pm
Location: Attleboro

Re: tulane game

Post by photoman » Mon Sep 05, 2022 11:58 am

The process has been going on for 10 years now. There's no more trust left in the tank.

dennisdent
Senior
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 7:18 pm
Location: Too close to the Beltway

Re: tulane game

Post by dennisdent » Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:42 pm

tdmass wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 9:26 am ^ I'm old and the "process" doesn't mean what it used to!

I didn't notice this before but I think Coach wasn't too pleased with some of his reputedly higher rated guys that
didn't come to play!

“We have some guys that like to play the game. We have some guys who need to put both feet in the ground and decide they need to be great football players,” Brown said. “If they make that decision, it’ll help our development. If they don’t, we’ll go with the guys that do.”
I have no doubt that Brown will turn over the roster by next season if he doesn't see the effort or development from the players. It was nice not to hear any excuses from Brown after the game. Heard way too many the past three years...Just show improvement each week.

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm

Re: tulane game

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:03 pm

17 yards passing between 2 QB’s for the game!!! Can someone explain me that?

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm

Re: tulane game

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:07 pm

Other than the second half of 2017 when we won 4 of 6, this “FBS football” thing has been a debacle. I’m sorry I’m trying to stay positive but what is the point of this other than make the school money and give coaches a job?

Floyd
Hall of Fame
Posts: 8934
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 am
Location: Not where I should be

Re: tulane game

Post by Floyd » Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:35 pm

Zoo, it hasn't been pretty so far but if we gave up on hoops in the early 80's or even hockey not too long ago, we would have missed historical times for both programs. Did everyone expect to go undefeated this year? Its a rebuild, lets give it more than a game or a season. The staff looks strong, lets at least give them reasonable time to turn it around. It'll get better
Time to Win

stevemaz
Senior
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:23 am

Re: tulane game

Post by stevemaz » Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:54 pm

ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:07 pm Other than the second half of 2017 when we won 4 of 6, this “FBS football” thing has been a debacle. I’m sorry I’m trying to stay positive but what is the point of this other than make the school money and give coaches a job?
I guess we should forget that the rise in the Public School rankings conicided with the move to FBS football? Yes, its about money...

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm

Re: tulane game

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:15 pm

stevemaz wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:54 pm
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:07 pm Other than the second half of 2017 when we won 4 of 6, this “FBS football” thing has been a debacle. I’m sorry I’m trying to stay positive but what is the point of this other than make the school money and give coaches a job?
I guess we should forget that the rise in the Public School rankings conicided with the move to FBS football? Yes, its about money...
SteveMaz and Floyd, I am total agreement that FBS and the big increase in USNWR rankings etc go hand in hand. Just google "UMass football crosses the rubicon" and you'll know what I am talking about. I'm just getting a little tired of the same 32 point losses (at least no shutout) and it's 2019 - 2021 again. Yeah we MIGHT get one or two wins this year.......probably one and it might not be over Stony Brook. I'm sorry, Don Brown is about as experienced a head coach as you are going to get before he's over the hill (can't physically do the job/call plays from the booth like Papa Joe at the end). Hoping for the best. We need a QB who can throw a football. Unless we are settling on the "game manager/Peyton Manning" type. I'm still going to donate $500 per win to the Gridiron Club for every win but realistically until we have Jonathan Taylor or Najee Harris or Derrick Henry in the backfield, we're screwed.

Post Reply